I recently read a Forbes Magazine article by Michael Schmidt dated August 27, 2013 named Don’t Take Dividends for Granted. The name itself caught my attention. Now reading an article from 2013 may seem quite dated, but knowing that companies have been paying dividends to their shareholders since the 1600s makes the article appear a bit more timely, if not cutting edge.
Investors looking for income can find one solution in buying companies that steadily pay dividends. Good companies tend to pay dividends year-after-year, with many increasing their dividend payouts. Stocks that not only pay a dividend, but also increase those dividends, historically have proven to be less sensitive to market volatility while actually performing better than those that pay no dividends at all. In relatively recent years, however, many in the market have lost sight of the benefits of dividend paying stocks and have turned their focus to growth stocks.
Since 1926 dividends have contributed to at least 45% of the total return of stocks in the S&P 500, but dividends are not as sexy or seductive to many investors as the potential for big growth in the stock’s price. And much of the media noise focuses on those companies that project great things moving forward. When the market is growing, and it’s easy to pick a stock that is increasing in value, it is easy to shun companies that pay dividends while moving little in stock price. However, when market volatility or downturn hits, many investors holding the growth positions flood back into the companies that pay the higher dividends.
Remember the late 1990’s? The tech boom was crazy. Companies carried extremely high valuations while not making any money – and that was a good thing? Growth stocks were all the sizzle. Money flowed out of income/value stocks and into the growth stocks. This fall from grace of income/value stocks lasted right up until the tech bubble burst. As the tech giants started to fall, money flowed back into the old, boring dividend paying companies.
It’s not uncommon for both growth stocks and dividend-paying stocks to perform well during bull markets, with the growth stocks on average, out-performing the dividend-paying stocks. However, dividend-paying stocks tend to handle bear markets better than growth stocks as shareholders continue to receive their dividends throughout the downturn. It is nice to be paid for holding a company regardless of the movement of the market. Sexy and trendy stocks garner much media attention today, and investors can do well if they know when to get out. But that’s the trick, isn’t it? It’s by holding the steady dividend paying stocks where many investors tend to come out on top in the long run.
Just because a company pays a 5% dividend, that doesn’t necessarily mean it is better than a company that pays a 3% dividend. There are a few points to analyze when looking at the two companies, such as:
- How long has the company been paying its dividend?
- Has the company been steadily increasing its dividend?
- Has the company recently cut its dividend?
- Is the company paying out in dividend more than it is earning in a given year?
In the Forbes article, Michael Schmidt reports “while the difference in total return is nominal between dividend payers and dividend growers, just paying a dividend at all added nearly a full percentage point of total return over time. Dividend growers not only added value, but experienced far less volatility during both bull and bear markets from 1996-2012. The most compelling proof indicates companies that cut their dividends over this time period were twice as volatile as those that increased their dividends.”