{"id":2255,"date":"2018-07-10T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2018-07-10T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.insightfolios.com\/2018\/07\/10\/dont-take-dividends-for-granted\/"},"modified":"2020-09-03T17:20:24","modified_gmt":"2020-09-03T17:20:24","slug":"dont-take-dividends-for-granted","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/insightfolios.com\/2018\/07\/10\/dont-take-dividends-for-granted\/","title":{"rendered":"Don\u2019t Take Dividends For Granted"},"content":{"rendered":"

I recently read a Forbes Magazine article by Michael Schmidt dated August 27, 2013 named\u00a0Don\u2019t Take Dividends for Granted<\/strong>. The name itself caught my attention. Now reading an article from 2013 may seem quite dated, but knowing that companies have been paying dividends to their shareholders since the 1600s makes the article appear a bit more timely, if not cutting edge.<\/p>\n

Investors looking for income can find one solution in buying companies that steadily pay dividends. Good companies tend to pay dividends year-after-year, with many increasing their dividend payouts. Stocks that not only pay a dividend, but also increase those dividends, historically have proven to be less sensitive to market volatility while actually performing better than those that pay no dividends at all. In relatively recent years, however, many in the market have lost sight of the benefits of dividend paying stocks and have turned their focus to growth stocks.<\/p>\n

Since 1926 dividends have contributed to at least 45% of the total return of stocks in the S&P 500, but dividends are not as sexy or seductive to many investors as the potential for big growth in the stock\u2019s price. And much of the media noise focuses on those companies that project great things moving forward. When the market is growing, and it\u2019s easy to pick a stock that is increasing in value, it is easy to shun companies that pay dividends while moving little in stock price. However, when market volatility or downturn hits, many investors holding the growth positions flood back into the companies that pay the higher dividends.<\/p>\n

What are Dividends and What Kind of Companies Pay Them?<\/h4>\n

Companies are not required to pay dividends. Typically when a company is mature and stable and doesn\u2019t need as much reinvestment back into the company for growth, it can take advantage of the ability to pay a portion of the company\u2019s earnings back to the shareholders in the form of dividends. The company\u2019s board of directors declares the dividends to be paid to the shareholders. Companies that not only pay dividends consistently, but also grow the amount paid have historically performed better than those that pay no dividends or don\u2019t increase them.<\/p>\n

Historical Comparisons<\/h4>\n

Remember the late 1990\u2019s? The tech boom was crazy. Companies carried extremely high valuations while not making any money \u2013 and that was a good thing? Growth stocks were all the sizzle. Money flowed out of income\/value stocks and into the growth stocks. This fall from grace of income\/value stocks lasted right up until the tech bubble burst. As the tech giants started to fall, money flowed back into the old, boring dividend paying companies.<\/p>\n

It\u2019s not uncommon for both growth stocks and dividend-paying stocks to perform well during bull markets, with the growth stocks on average, out-performing the dividend-paying stocks. However, dividend-paying stocks tend to handle bear markets better than growth stocks as shareholders continue to receive their dividends throughout the downturn. It is nice to be paid for holding a company regardless of the movement of the market. Sexy and trendy stocks garner much media attention today, and investors can do well if they know when to get out. But that\u2019s the trick, isn\u2019t it? It\u2019s by holding the steady dividend paying stocks where many investors tend to come out on top in the long run.<\/p>\n

My Dividend is Better Than Yours<\/h4>\n

Just because a company pays a 5% dividend, that doesn\u2019t necessarily mean it is better than a company that pays a 3% dividend.\u00a0 There are a few points to analyze when looking at the two companies, such as:<\/p>\n